Frisco (214) 269-9601 Lewisville (469) 948-4764 Flower Mound (469) 817-3273
Navigating Parental Alienation – A Guide for Families

Navigating Parental Alienation – A Guide for Families

Navigating Child Reluctance in Post-Divorce Parenting: A Guide for Texas Families 

As children of separated parents grow older, they may express reluctance to spend time with one of their parents. This can strain not only the relationship between the child and the parent but also between the parents themselves. If left unaddressed, these issues might lead to estrangement or even legal disputes. Therefore, addressing the issue promptly and effectively is crucial. Sometimes, but not always, that reluctance is caused by Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS). 

Understanding the Root Cause 

The first step in tackling this issue is to have an open conversation with your child to understand their reasons for reluctance. Are they bored, missing friends or activities, or is there an issue in the parent-child relationship? Identifying the root cause is key to addressing the problem effectively. Children often take emotional cues from their parents or caregivers, so maintaining a positive attitude about the other parent can significantly influence your child’s perception and willingness to spend time with them. 

Encouraging Positive Interactions 

In non-PAS cases, the other parent might encouraging positive discussions about how spending time with the other parent can be beneficial. Visits can be framed as exciting adventures or mini-vacations, focusing on the fun and unique opportunities each parent can offer. It’s essential to foster a supportive environment where the child feels comfortable and excited about maintaining a relationship with both parents. 

Addressing Parental Alienation 

In some cases, unfortunately, one parent might actively discourage the child from visiting the other parent, leading to Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS). This syndrome involves a parent, often with the assistance of his or her relatives, fostering a child’s rejection of the other parent. Parental alienation is treated as child abuse in Texas, and allegations are taken seriously by the courts. If you suspect PAS is occurring, quickly consulting a lawyer experienced in such cases is vital. Delaying action can exacerbate the issue, such as by allowing false memories to go unchallenged for long enough that they seem, to the child, to be actual memories.  

Legal Compliance and Enforcement 

If a parent is non-compliant with a possession order by not facilitating visits, judicial enforcement and/or the ordering of Reunification Therapy, might be necessary. Courts expect their orders to be followed, and failing to do so may result in dire consequences for the non-compliant parent; especially if that non-compliance harms a child’s relationship with his or her other parent. Contempt of court, and incarceration, are sometimes a consequence for alienating parents. Texas courts, for instance, are increasingly intolerant of parents who claim they cannot facilitate visits, while being able to manage other commitments for the child, such as school or sports activities. 

The Importance of Legal Guidance 

In litigation, such as an Enforcement Action, or the ordering of Reunification Therapy, approaches may vary by state. Consulting with an attorney familiar with your local jurisdiction is essential. An experienced Family Lawyer can help navigate the complexities of these cases and ensure that both the child’s and parents’ rights are protected. 

Conclusion 

Children deserve healthy relationships with both parents, and courts have tools to ensure that ordered possession periods occur.  It’s crucial to address any reluctance or alienation issues promptly to safeguard these relationships. These are complicated cases, in which the information provided by the child is sometimes either not factually valid; or, is interpreted in the worst possible way, by the child; with the encouragement and assistance of the alienating parent.  

Until next time, continue to love and support your kids, fostering a nurturing environment that encourages strong family bonds.   

Call us now for a free phone consultation

Heiman Law Firm – Frisco
2770 Main Street
Suite 179
Frisco, TX 75033
(214) 269-9601

Heiman Law Firm – Lewisville
405 State Highway 121 Byp
Ste A250
Lewisville, Texas 75067-4183
(469) 948-4764

Heiman Law Firm – Flower Mound
2201 Spinks Rd
Flower Mound, TX 75022
(469) 817-3273

heiman law firm logo

We service the North Texas area including

Plano, Frisco, Flower Mound, Denton, Prosper, Lewisville, Little Elm, and the Colony.

Copyright © 2025Heiman Law Firm. All Rights Reserved. Website by Butler I. T. and Higher ADvantage

More About Protective Orders

More About Protective Orders

Protective orders are vital legal instruments designed to protect victims of domestic violence, assault, abuse, stalking, and threats from family or household members, or current or former dating partners. This blog post explores key considerations related to these cases, building on topics discussed in our previous articles on [Legal Protections for Family Violence (Part 1)] and [Legal Protections Available for Family Violence (Part 2)]. At the bottom of this post is a link for more details about the topics discussed herein.

Whether you are seeking a protective order or one is being sought against you, it is important to keep the following considerations in mind:

  1. Evidentiary Challenges: Family violence cases often involve unique challenges, such as the lack of witnesses or ambiguous physical evidence. It is crucial to determine whether injuries were caused by an attack, were defensive in nature, or resulted from an unrelated event. Consistencies and inconsistencies in statements made to authorities, healthcare providers, and others are significant, as are the congruences between injuries and incident reports. Both the petitioner and the accused should concentrate on case details, as resolutions often hinge on these specifics.
  2. Emergency vs. Long-term Protective Orders: In Texas, Emergency Protective Orders can be issued without a hearing following an arrest for a family violence crime, typically lasting 61 days. These differ from longer-term protective orders, which are granted by a District Court after a formal application and hearing.
  3. Investigative Process: Investigations usually commence with a police report. It is important to ensure consistency between the police report, medical records, witness statements, and other evidence such as photos or recordings. Discrepancies can be used by defense attorneys to question the credibility of the incident.
  4. Witness Testimony: Witnesses are crucial in supporting or refuting allegations, when they are available. Unfortunately, often they are not available. Attorneys should gather testimony from any and all witnesses, and then, assess their consistency with other evidence. A supposedly impartial witness’s refusal to cooperate may indicate bias, affecting their credibility at trial, when the refusal to cooperate is presented to the court. Naturally, friends and relatives of either the accuser or accused will not, likely, cooperate with the other party.
  5. Medical Evidence: If the alleged victim sought medical treatment, the medical report is pivotal in confirming whether injuries align with the victim’s account. There will be a History, section, in which the healthcare provider describes what the patient related about the injuries. There may, also, be drawings or photographs.  Both parties should be aware of the existence and implications of this information.
  6. Communication Analysis: Examining communications between the parties before and after the incident can offer insights into the events. Text messages or other communication forms may clarify what likely occurred.

These considerations are further discussed in this blog post, “Important Factors in Cases Requesting Protective Orders.”

Conclusion

Protective order cases can significantly impact the lives of those involved. It is essential to approach these cases seriously to ensure the court makes informed decisions about issuing a protective order. By focusing on details and evidence, legal professionals can better serve their clients and uphold justice.

 

Call us now for a free phone consultation

Heiman Law Firm – Frisco
2770 Main Street
Suite 179
Frisco, TX 75033
(214) 269-9601

Heiman Law Firm – Lewisville
405 State Highway 121 Byp
Ste A250
Lewisville, Texas 75067-4183
(469) 948-4764

Heiman Law Firm – Flower Mound
2201 Spinks Rd
Flower Mound, TX 75022
(469) 817-3273

heiman law firm logo

We service the North Texas area including

Plano, Frisco, Flower Mound, Denton, Prosper, Lewisville, Little Elm, and the Colony.

Copyright © 2025Heiman Law Firm. All Rights Reserved. Website by Butler I. T. and Higher ADvantage

How is our family law firm different??

How is our family law firm different??

Clients who come to us, after using larger law firms, often complain that those bigger law firms seem to be more focused on generating fees, than providing effective and efficient representation. They tell us stories of enduring too many long, in-person interviews and meetings with various staff members (which they are charged for); being provided, and billed for, detailed written information about Texas Property Law, most of which does not even apply to the facts of their own case; vast amounts of discovery requests (such as oral depositions and subpoenas of non-parties) being generated and billed for) at the beginning of the case—instead of first narrowing the case to determine if formal discovery is needed or desirable; and if so, which forms of discovery would work best for your case. We have even experienced firms that will continue litigating a case after it has become obvious that their claims stand little-to-no chance of prevailing. They continue to litigate simply to generate attorney’s fees. Each and all of those activities leave clients believing that the practice of law is about earning money for legal professionals

While our firm does, indeed, seek to generate fees, we come at it entirely differently. Having practiced in DFW since 1989, the overwhelming majority of our clients come to us by referral—either from our prior (or current) clients; or, from other attorneys who do not practice Family Law; at least not highly adversarial Family Law cases. Why is that? Well, we know that providing quality representation is important; but so is doing it an efficient and effective manner.

So, rather than starting-off with an in-person consultation, that our clients would be billed for, we, instead, offer free 30-minute initial consultations over the phone. Next, when our clients hire us, instead of having oral conversations with our clients (in order to obtain basic case information), we, instead,  send secure links to a portal, where our clients are prompted to enter information about themselves, their families, and their property (if applicable) directly into our system  We can retrieve that information as needed; and, in significantly less time than it would take to gather that information through a conversation.

After retrieving that information, we discuss case options (such as, e.g., whether we need to prepare, and send, discovery requests to another party, or a non-party; whether we want to request temporary relief (such as Temporary Custody and Support Orders) from the court; and so on. Sometimes those items are desirable, and at other times, they are not. The point is that case activities are planned, so that costs and benefits can be analyzed, considered, and decided upon.

Finally, we bill in 1/10 hour increments, rather than the traditional quarter-hour increments. Also, we will aggregate brief emails together (which are sent back-and forth in a brief conversation), and make just one charge for the bunch, rather than charging for each email sent or received. I don’t like being nickel–and-dimed as a consumer; and so, we work to avoid doing that as legal professionals.

As of yesterday, our law firm appeared in spot #28 of a search for local attorneys. That ranking not likely to generate new clients. And, yet we stay busy. Referrals are the key to our practice thriving. We know that, respect it, and work to earn those referrals

Thank you for taking the time to read this piece!

My best,

David

https://heimanlawfirm.com

 

Call us now for a free phone consultation

Heiman Law Firm – Frisco
2770 Main Street
Suite 179
Frisco, TX 75033
(214) 269-9601

Heiman Law Firm – Lewisville
405 State Highway 121 Byp
Ste A250
Lewisville, Texas 75067-4183
(469) 948-4764

Heiman Law Firm – Flower Mound
2201 Spinks Rd
Flower Mound, TX 75022
(469) 817-3273

heiman law firm logo

We service the North Texas area including

Plano, Frisco, Flower Mound, Denton, Prosper, Lewisville, Little Elm, and the Colony.

Copyright © 2025Heiman Law Firm. All Rights Reserved. Website by Butler I. T. and Higher ADvantage

“If the parents cannot agree about child custody (“conservatorship”) how will the court make a decision on that issue?

“If the parents cannot agree about child custody (“conservatorship”) how will the court make a decision on that issue?

The parties (parents) will present evidence, and then the court will make a decision that the Judge believes will be in the child(ren)’s best interest.

In determining that best interest, courts consider the following, non-exclusive factors in Texas:

● the desires of the child

● the emotional and physical needs of the child now and in the future

● the emotional and physical danger (of one parent) to the child now and in the future

● the parental abilities of the individuals seeking custody

● the programs available to assist the parents

● the plans for the child by these individuals

● the stability of both parties’ homes and any acts or omissions of a parent which may indicate that the existing parent-child relationship is not a proper one

● any excuse for the acts or omissions of a parent.

We will want to prepare our evidence in a logical, easy-to-understand manner, so that our presentation best shows why those factors favor you.

That is why it is important that you take the time necessary to thoughtfully and completely input information into our system. We will discuss all of this with you prior to any hearing or mediation.

Call us now for a free phone consultation

Heiman Law Firm – Frisco
2770 Main Street
Suite 179
Frisco, TX 75033
(214) 269-9601

Heiman Law Firm – Lewisville
405 State Highway 121 Byp
Ste A250
Lewisville, Texas 75067-4183
(469) 948-4764

Heiman Law Firm – Flower Mound
2201 Spinks Rd
Flower Mound, TX 75022
(469) 817-3273

heiman law firm logo

We service the North Texas area including

Plano, Frisco, Flower Mound, Denton, Prosper, Lewisville, Little Elm, and the Colony.

Copyright © 2025Heiman Law Firm. All Rights Reserved. Website by Butler I. T. and Higher ADvantage

Property Agreements Made During Marriage

Property Agreements Made During Marriage

Previously, we wrote about Premarital Property Agreements. We noted there that Texas law broadly supports Marital Property Agreements. Today we will discuss agreements entered into during a marriage[1], instead of before marrying.[2]

The Texas family Code states that “At any time, the spouses may partition (divide-up) or exchange (trade) all or part of their community property, then existing, or to be acquired, as the spouses may desire. Property or a property interest transferred to a spouse becomes that spouse’s separate property. The partition or exchange of property may also provide that future earnings and income arising from the transferred property shall be the separate property of the owning spouse.”[3]

The breadth of that authority allows the spouses to agree, if they choose to, that there will be no community property. Any property which would otherwise be community can be divided, and then awarded to one or the other spouse, as separate property. Going further the income from a spouse’s separate property (such as interest from a Savings Account or Certificate of Deposit (CD), stock dividends, or bond coupon payments), which would ordinarily be community property, can be agreed to be separate property.

The beauty of these agreements is that they can be constructed to leave no property to argue about when a marriage ends, by either death or divorce (and, of course, every marriage eventually ends by one of those means). Of course, not every agreement will dispose of all property and all income, but it can dispose of as much or as little as the spouses wish.

So, you might be asking “what is required for these agreements to become effective?” Well, the answer is “not much; merely an expression of their agreement.” That agreement must be in writing. And, it must be signed by both parties. That is all! No consideration (exchange of something of value between the spouses) is required.

As noted within our previous post regarding premarital property agreements, Texas law favors the enforcement of marital property agreements voluntarily entered into by parties. Accordingly, the only way for a party to such an agreement to avoid that enforcement is for that party to prove that either:

  1. It was not voluntarily signed by the party seeking to prevent enforcement;

or

2a. The agreement was unconscionable when it was signed; and

2b. A fair and reasonable disclosure of the property or financial obligations of the other party was not made; and

2c. That disclosure was not waived by the parties to the agreement; and

2d. The party seeking to avoid the enforcement did not have, and reasonably could not have had, adequate knowledge of the property or financial obligations of the other party.

Unless those very narrow exceptions are proved, then the agreement will be enforced by the court, if requested. The Supreme Court of Texas has held that

“Texas has a strong public policy favoring freedom of contract…We have repeatedly recognized that parties shall have the utmost liberty of contracting. And that their contracts, when entered into freely and voluntarily, shall be held sacred and shall be enforced by the courts.” In re Marriage of I.C., 551 S.W.3d 119, 124 (Tex. 2018).

Since there is so much that can be done with these agreements, I recommend that you consult with an attorney who is sufficiently experienced with them, if you are thinking of using one.

That’s all for today. Be sure to check back from time-to-time for more Family Law discussions!

[1] These are sometimes called “Post-Nup’s,” or “Post-Nuptial Agreements.” The Texas Family Code refers to them as “Partition and exchange Agreements.”

[2] As with all of our blog posts, we limit our discussion to the law of Texas.

[3] Texas Family Code section 4.102

Call us now for a free phone consultation

Heiman Law Firm – Frisco
2770 Main Street
Suite 179
Frisco, TX 75033
(214) 269-9601

Heiman Law Firm – Lewisville
405 State Highway 121 Byp
Ste A250
Lewisville, Texas 75067-4183
(469) 948-4764

Heiman Law Firm – Flower Mound
2201 Spinks Rd
Flower Mound, TX 75022
(469) 817-3273

heiman law firm logo

We service the North Texas area including

Plano, Frisco, Flower Mound, Denton, Prosper, Lewisville, Little Elm, and the Colony.

Copyright © 2025Heiman Law Firm. All Rights Reserved. Website by Butler I. T. and Higher ADvantage

How Does Family Violence Affect a Family Law Case

How Does Family Violence Affect a Family Law Case

We previously discussed Family Violence, and available Protective Orders within “Legal Protections for Family Violence (Part 1),” “Legal Protections Available for Family Violence,” (Part 2), and “Important Factors in Cases Requesting Protective Orders.” Those posts discuss the availability of those orders; issues that are important for the court to determine whether Family Violence has occurred; and, “Just what is Family Violence, anyway?” Today, we will discuss a different, but related subject: how does a finding of Family Violence affect a Family Law case?

The relationships between parents, with one another, as well as the relationships that those parents have with their children, was once thought to be a ‘family matter” that was beyond the scope of courts to address. The idea was that family members can and should address any issues that they have with one another. Obviously, that way of thinking has been replaced with one that seeks to protect children from being abused or neglected, themselves, and from growing up in homes where there is Domestic Violence occurring. The ways that our courts do that during Family Law litigation is the subject of today’s writing.

Initially, it is important to note that while each of the 50 states comprising the United States has laws protecting children in these circumstances, we will limit our discussions to Texas law today. For information on the laws of other jurisdictions, please consult with a properly licensed and experienced attorney for that jurisdiction.

Under Texas law, Family Law cases involving children (Suits Affecting the Parent-Child Relationship) begin with certain presumptions. These include presuming that parents should be appointed as Joint Managing Conservators of their children;[1] and, that each parent should be awarded a minimum of Standard Possession of his or her children[2] who are three years of age or older.[3]  Those presumptions, however, do not apply when “credible evidence is presented of a history or pattern of” child neglect, child abuse, or abuse of the other parent.[4]  In those instances, other presumptions apply.

Those other presumptions include restricting or limiting the access of the “violent parent” to the children;[5] and, appointing the “Non-Violent Parent” as the Sole Managing Conservator of the children.[6] The court may require that any possession of the children given to the “Violent Parent” “be continuously supervised by an entity or person chosen by the court.” And, the exchange of the children, instead of taking place at the children’s schools, “occur in a protective setting.” The court can, also, require that a parent “abstain from the consumption of alcohol or a controlled substance … within 12 hours prior to or during the period of access to the child.” The court has the power to, also, require that as a condition of having child possession, the Violent Parent ”complete a battering intervention and prevention program;” or, (if that is unavailable), complete a program with a mental health professional who has proper education, licensing, and training is domestic violence.

Texas law has presumption upholding the rights of parents to raise their children. If, however, it is shown that children are not safe with that parent, our courts have powerful tools to protect children from that parent.

Until next time, keep on loving those kiddos!

[1] TFC sec. 153.131

[2] TFC sec. 153.252

[3] TFC sec. 153.254

[4] TFC sec. 153.004 & 153.005

[5] Id.

[6] A Sole Managing Conservator makes most of the important parenting decisions, without needing to first obtain the agreement of the other parent, or anyone else, for that matter. This is similar to when fathers used to merely pay child support, and have weekend visits, while the Mother “raised” the children.

Call us now for a free phone consultation

Heiman Law Firm – Frisco
2770 Main Street
Suite 179
Frisco, TX 75033
(214) 269-9601

Heiman Law Firm – Lewisville
405 State Highway 121 Byp
Ste A250
Lewisville, Texas 75067-4183
(469) 948-4764

Heiman Law Firm – Flower Mound
2201 Spinks Rd
Flower Mound, TX 75022
(469) 817-3273

heiman law firm logo

We service the North Texas area including

Plano, Frisco, Flower Mound, Denton, Prosper, Lewisville, Little Elm, and the Colony.

Copyright © 2025Heiman Law Firm. All Rights Reserved. Website by Butler I. T. and Higher ADvantage

What to do if Child Support is Still Being Withheld After Kids are Adults

We helped a former client today who learned that his employer was continuing to withhold child support payments from his check, even though his children were “emancipated” (that is, they are at least 18 years of age, out of high school, and not disabled). It occurs to me that other folks in Texas might find themselves in this position, also; so, I am writing about that situation today.[1]

The first step in addressing this issue is taking a look at the Withholding Order. Does it explain (as it should) that child support is to be withheld for only so long as no child is
“unemancipated?” (“emancipation” is explained, above). If it does, then you should contact your Human Resources Dept. to discuss the withholding with them. For smaller companies, especially those which operate in just Texas, this may be effective. Larger, more geographically diverse organizations, often require that withholding for child support continue until such time as they receive a new court order that expressly terminates that withholding (this is silly, in my opinion, because the withholding order, itself, mandates the termination of the withholding when the kids age-out; nevertheless, bureaucracies might not care, and insist upon their “policies” being followed, which might require a new order). Since suing your employer to enforce the terms of the withholding order seems unlikely to be a good strategy (for obvious reasons), we will need to try to satisfy their policies.

When another order is required by your employer, we consider contacting the parent (who is receiving the wrongly withheld child support), to see whether s/he will agree to  an order terminating the child support withholding.[2] If so, then a motion can be filed, requesting termination of the withholding; and then, an Agreed Order Terminating Withholding for Child Support prepared, signed, and submitted to the court. Next, we contact the Court Coordinator, for your particular court, to see whether the court will require a hearing (usually, no hearing is required, unless another party is involved in the case, such as Child Protective Services). If no hearing is required, then the Judge should sign your order upon our submission of it.

If a hearing is required, then we will set it, working with the Court Coordinator, for available court settings (dates and times for hearings). Once it is set, then all parties (usually, just the other parent) must be formally notified of the setting. Then, at the time of the hearing, we appear with you, present your testimony, and our argument, regarding why termination should end, and then, request the Judge sign the order.

Once we have a signed order, we will contacthe District Clerk’s Office to request that the order be sent to your employer. They will need to have a completed form with various information about your case, your employer, and the order. And, there may be a fee payment required.

Finally, the order should be sent by the District Clerk’s Office to your employer. And, the withholding should terminate.

We hope that this information has been helpful.

Until next time, keep on loving those kiddos!

 

Best regards,

 

David

[1] We are licensed to practice law in Texas, and are familiar with the child support withholding process in Texas. Accordingly, our comments apply only to those who have a child support withholding order issued by a Texas state court

[2]  Some parental relationships are toxic ones. When we are dealing with one of those, in which the parents can’t/won’t cooperate about anything, then we skip this step.

Heiman Law Firm – Frisco
2770 Main Street
Suite 179
Frisco, TX 75033
(214) 269-9601

Heiman Law Firm – Lewisville
405 State Highway 121 Byp
Ste A250
Lewisville, Texas 75067-4183
(469) 948-4764

Heiman Law Firm – Flower Mound
2201 Spinks Rd
Flower Mound, TX 75022
(469) 817-3273

heiman law firm logo

Office Hours

Monday-Friday By Appointment
9:00 am to 5:00 pm 

Saturday Appointments Available

We have offices in Lewisville, Frisco, and Flower Mound.  We service the North Texas area including
Plano, Frisco, Flower Mound, Denton, Prosper, Lewisville, Little Elm, and the Colony.

Copyright © 2025Heiman Law Firm. All Rights Reserved. Website by Butler I. T. and Higher ADvantage

Can I appeal my Divorce Case Judgment?

Today, we will discuss your options, when you are dissatisfied with the result of your divorce case.

Initially, it bears repeating that in most (perhaps, all) U.S. jurisdictions, fewer than 5 percent (5%)of the filed cases make it all of the way through trial. And, of those a very small percentage are appealed. So, the odds of your having an appeal are small. Nevertheless, appeals do happen.

We have done appellate work in Texas for more than thirty (30) years, so we have learned a few things about them. To begin with, it’s important to note that an appellate court is not going to reconsider the merits of the case, and (perhaps) reverse the judgment of the trial court, merely because one party is not satisfied with the case result. Instead, the appealing party (the “Appellant” in Texas state law practice) must show that the judgment of the trial court is based on reversible error. Let’s discuss this a bit.

In order for reversible error to exist, the appealing party must show (in Texas) that:

  1. the court made an error in its rulings; and, that error was of such magnitude that it probably caused the rendition of an improper judgment; or,
  2. the court abused in discretion on matters for which it has discretion. Those discretionary matters include issues such as child custody, and the award of Community Property[1]) are not going to be found to be error, unless the court’s judgment is found to be an abuse of that discretion. In Texas, that means that the court acted arbitrarily or unreasonably; or, without reference to guiding rules or principles. That is (obviously) a high standard to meet.

In regard to the first of those, one or more erroneous rulings, typically on a matter of law, must be shown. For example, incompetent evidence is admitted; or, improper Jury Argument is made (if your case, in fact, has a Jury). Then, it must be shown that the Appellant properly preserved that error, such as by making an objection; obtaining an adversary ruling (a ruling against the objection; and, (perhaps) offering proof of excluded evidence.[2] That establishes error. Next, the more difficult task of showing that the error is reversible must be shown.

The presumption in Texas is that any error committed by the trial court is “Harmless.” In order to overcome that presumption, the Appellant must show (again, in Texas) that “the error complained of:

(1) probably caused the rendition of an improper judgment; or

(2) probably prevented the appellant from properly presenting the case to the court of appeals. (TRAP 44.1).”

Item Number 2 rarely occurs, in our experience. So, the focus is on Item 1, above. To show that an improper judgment resulted on account of the error, that error must be of such magnitude that it likely overcomes the cumulative result of the other case elements. So, we are not talking about trivial matters. Errors of this kind are matters such as admitting expert testimony (and, likely opinions) that were not shown to be relevant and reliable. Or, excluding important evidence (documents, audio-visual materials, or testimony, e.g.) that would likely significantly alter the case result. That is not an easy task.

Appellate work is specialized and highly technical. If you believe that you may have an appealable issue, please contact a qualified appellate lawyer as soon as possible. There are time limits which, if missed, can end the option of appealing a trial court’s judgment.

That’s all for today: keep on loving those kiddos (Grown-ups, too)!

 

My best,

 

David

 

[1] Texas is one of just eight (8) Community Property States; so, this concept of “awarding Community Property” does not apply to the other states and territories on the United States)

[2] This is a general discussion The technicalities of error preservation are beyond the scope of this post.

Call us now for a free phone consultation

Heiman Law Firm – Frisco
2770 Main Street
Suite 179
Frisco, TX 75033
(214) 269-9601

Heiman Law Firm – Lewisville
405 State Highway 121 Byp
Ste A250
Lewisville, Texas 75067-4183
(469) 948-4764

Heiman Law Firm – Flower Mound
2201 Spinks Rd
Flower Mound, TX 75022
(469) 817-3273

heiman law firm logo

We service the North Texas area including

Plano, Frisco, Flower Mound, Denton, Prosper, Lewisville, Little Elm, and the Colony.

Copyright © 2025Heiman Law Firm. All Rights Reserved. Website by Butler I. T. and Higher ADvantage

Premarital Property Agreements in Texas

It is our experience that many folks do not understand just how useful and powerful Premarital Property Agreements (PPA) can be in Texas. We hope to bring you some helpful information in that regard today. Accordingly, here is a brief, introductory discussion of PPA:

To begin, it is important to know that Texas law broadly supports the use of marital property agreements, both those made prior to marriage, as well as those made during marriage. Today, we will discuss Premarital Property Agreements. We will later write about marital property agreements made during marriage. So, please check back later for information about those.        

Next, the Texas Family Code expressly provides that:

  1. “(a) premarital agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties. The agreement is enforceable without consideration (i.e., without the exchange of anything of value, other than the terms of the agreement itself); Texas Family Code Section 4.002
  2. The parties are authorized to make a wide range of property agreements, provided that they are not in violation of public policy; and which do not purport to adversely affect the right to child support.

Due to that incredible breadth of that authority, PPA can completely change how people’s assets and liabilities will be divided upon death or divorce. For example, many of our clients who have been previously divorced want to ensure that there will be no fight about assets (such as retirement benefits or home equity) either upon their death, or upon another (potential) divorce. They may also wish to agree that there will be no Community Property created; but rather, that each spouse will own his or her earnings, and the property purchased with those earnings, as Separate Property. (Texas Family Code Section 4.003). Reimbursement claims can also be affected or eliminated by these agreements. (Texas Family Code Section 3.410). When done correctly, there is nothing left to divide nor allocate upon a party’s death or divorce, unless the parties wish to create some joint property, by the terms of their agreement.

  1. These types of agreements become effective upon marriage; (Texas Family Code Section 4.004).
  2. Importantly, these agreements may be amended during marriage (again, without consideration) in writing, signed by the parties. (Texas Family Code Section 4.005)

To support the use of premarital property agreements, Texas law favors the enforcement of premarital agreements voluntarily entered into by parties. Accordingly, the only way for a party to such an agreement to avoid that enforcement (assuming that the agreements become an issue in a subsequent marriage dissolution, such as a divorce, action between the parties) is for that party to prove that either:

  1. It was not voluntarily signed by the party seeking to prevent enforcement.

or

2a. The agreement was unconscionable when it was signed; and

2b. A fair and reasonable disclosure of the property or financial obligations of the other party was not made; and

2c. That disclosure was not waived by the parties to the agreement; and

2d. The party seeking to avoid the enforcement did not have, and reasonably could not have had, adequate knowledge of the property or financial obligations of the other party.

Unless those very narrow exceptions are proved, then the agreement will be enforced by the court, if requested. The Supreme Court of Texas has held that

“Recognizing (additional exceptions to enforceability, besides those two listed above) would judicially expand (the very limited exceptions provided by Texas law) and run afoul of our longstanding preference to protect the freedom of contract by enforcing contracts as written. Texas has a strong public policy favoring freedom of contract that is firmly embedded in our jurisprudence. We have repeatedly recognized that parties shall have the utmost liberty of contracting. And that their contracts, when entered into freely and voluntarily, shall be held sacred and shall be enforced by the courts. We rarely find a contract unenforceable on public policy grounds. Premarital agreements are no exception.” (internal quotations omitted) (emphasis added). In re Marriage of I.C., 551 S.W.3d 119, 124 (Tex. 2018).

Since there is so much that can be done through the usage of a PPA, it is recommended that, prior to your marriage, you consult with an attorney who is sufficiently experienced with them, if you are thinking using a Premarital Property Agreement.[1] I advise my clients to contact us as soon as a marriage is contemplated. We will want to have adequate time to discuss matters with our client; draft the initial documents; and then, have them reviewed by the other party’s attorney. Wedding Planning is stressful enough already, without adding an unnecessary, time-crunch element to them!

That is all for today. Please check our other blog posts and return from time to time to see newer ones.

[1] Please remember that other property agreements can be made during a marriage.

Call us now for a free phone consultation

Heiman Law Firm – Frisco
2770 Main Street
Suite 179
Frisco, TX 75033
(214) 269-9601

Heiman Law Firm – Lewisville
405 State Highway 121 Byp
Ste A250
Lewisville, Texas 75067-4183
(469) 948-4764

Heiman Law Firm – Flower Mound
2201 Spinks Rd
Flower Mound, TX 75022
(469) 817-3273

heiman law firm logo

We service the North Texas area including

Plano, Frisco, Flower Mound, Denton, Prosper, Lewisville, Little Elm, and the Colony.

Copyright © 2025Heiman Law Firm. All Rights Reserved. Website by Butler I. T. and Higher ADvantage

Can CPS Terminate Parental Rights Based on Old Events?

As always, I can give advice only about cases pending under Texas law, since I am licensed within only that state. CPS in other states may be similar or dissimilar to Texas CPS

The Department of Family and Protective Services (of which CPS is a part) states in their publications that:

“(w)e promote safe and healthy families and protect children and vulnerable adults from abuse, neglect, and exploitation.

Values

Accountable: We act with a sense of urgency to deliver results in an accountable, ethical, and transparent manner.

Respectful: We recognize the value of each person and act timely, value privacy, and treat all with respect.”[1]

In light of those express commitments to act “urgently,” and “timely,” we might expect that if CPS had concern(S) about the safety and welfare of children, then they would focus on recent events involving those children. In our experience, however, that is not always the case.[2]

Our courts have held that allegations of abuse or neglect against a parent must not be too remote in time, if termination of parental rights is sought because of that behavior. And, if you think about it, that makes sense: something that a parent did or did not do years ago does not bear strongly on a child’s current living circumstances. Put another way, “termination proceedings should be based on facts that are fresh enough to apply to the children at the time of the trial.”[3]

Texas CPS has to show not only some act of abuse or neglect by the parent, but also, that the termination is in the current “best interest” of the child. So, something that happened long ago does not provide solid evidence of what is currently in a child’s best interest. Things change over time; kids mature, and their needs change.

So, what are some examples of time periods that our courts have found to be too long past (remote) to support a current termination of parental rights? Well, in our research we have learned that our (Texas) courts have, so far, not defined that time period precisely. They have, however, determined in one case that that five (5) years between the act of abuse or neglect, and the termination trial, was too long. Another Texas court has held that three (3) years was too remote to support a termination finding.

Consistent with those cases, the Texas legislature has enacted legislation in Texas which requires generally (as with most things dictated by a law, there are exceptions to the general rule) that termination cases end within one year of when they are begun. But, of course, even if they meet that standard, the acts of abuse or neglect may still be found by a court to be too remote if the case was not started until a long time after the incident(s) occurred.

So, CPS should investigate a case soon enough after alleged abuse or neglect occurs; and, begin and complete their legal case timely. The burden of accomplishing those things fall on CPS, and not on the parents.

As with most legal matters, it is important to consult with an attorney for legal advice as soon as possible. Once a case has been filed, you may be entitled to have legal counsel appointed for you.

As always, we wish you the best, and hope that all kids are treated with love and respect.

Until next time, please take care of yourself and your loved ones!

 

Best regards,

 

David

 

[1][1] Texas Child Protective Services Handbook,” Section 1110

 

[2] Granted that some things, such as our government’s response to a pandemic, is out of the control of CPS

[3] This language is from a brief that we prepared and filed

 

 

Call us now for a free phone consultation

Heiman Law Firm – Frisco
2770 Main Street
Suite 179
Frisco, TX 75033
(214) 269-9601

Heiman Law Firm – Lewisville
405 State Highway 121 Byp
Ste A250
Lewisville, Texas 75067-4183
(469) 948-4764

Heiman Law Firm – Flower Mound
2201 Spinks Rd
Flower Mound, TX 75022
(469) 817-3273

heiman law firm logo

We service the North Texas area including

Plano, Frisco, Flower Mound, Denton, Prosper, Lewisville, Little Elm, and the Colony.

Copyright © 2025Heiman Law Firm. All Rights Reserved. Website by Butler I. T. and Higher ADvantage